Q: I'm curious to know how the hell guile-emacs deals with all of the dynamically scoped modules out there. Is there any effort to automatically modularize and namespace stuff?
Q: Would it be possible to support a GUI toolkit other than GTK?
Q: Do you plan to provide improvements to Elisp as a language, or is the focus on a compatibility layer to facilitate doing all new extensions, etc. in Scheme?
Q: Why is being able to interpret all of \`init.el\` an useful goal?
Q: Can we consider a translator like utility to convert elisp to scheme, once guile-emacs becomes a reality?
Q: Why is being able to interpret all of \`init.el\` an useful goal?
Q: What is the plan to handle elisp packages that depend on 3rd party/external libraries? (libgit/magit or rg/ripgrep)?
Q: Not really a question, but how about Schemacs as a name?
Q: Why is it not feasible for the Emacs layer that interprets Emacs Lisp (the core in C) ot have a Scheme interpreter, instead of using Guile?